![]() 1.
Participation (10%) We
are learning about these topics together and participation is a
key way to help each other learn. Attendance is required, but
obviously life will intervene and you will find you need to miss
class here or there: just keep me posted. Readings assigned for
that day should be done before coming to class and you
should be ready to share any thoughts, questions, ideas, or
connections with larger themes that emerged from your reading. At
the beginning of every class we will each share one thing from
the readings that caught our interest: an image, a line, a
quotation, or even something that just made no sense. If
you have difficulty or anxiety about speaking up in class, come
speak to me and we can work on strategies together. You can also
use the Discussion Board to post your ideas or thoughts about
the day’s readings if you need to miss class. 2.
Discussion board post and response (10% total) Once during each class unit you will create a post in response to a prompt asking you to step back and consider a larger theme relevant to the historical study of religion and attempt to make one connection to the next day’s readings (these prompts can be found on the course website and the Blackboard Discussion page, so you can have them in mind when you go do the readings). You should also reply to at least one other person’s post; all posts and responses are due by 9pm the evening before class (on 9/11, 10/16, 11/4, and 12/2) so please don’t wait until the last minute to post so others have a chance to respond to you. Post
1: Due by 9pm on Wednesday, September 11
3.
Response papers (15x4 = 60%) After each class unit you will complete a directed written response engaging with texts and topics we have covered in that unit: a rhetorical analysis; a creative response; an argument analysis; and a narrative analysis. Each response is due on the Friday following the end of the unit (9/27, 10/25, 11/15, 12/13) by 5pm to Blackboard. You may want to keep the prompts below in mind as you do the readings for each unit. a.
Rhetorical analysis (due by 5pm on Friday,
September 27) Format:
Your rhetorical analysis should be 500-750 words, double-spaced.
Your analysis should contain specific examples from the text
that support your reading, including direct quotations (which
can be cited by section number or page number of the reading). Choose
one of the following texts and prompts: b.
Creative response (due by 5pm on Friday,
October 25) Format: You can choose any format (as long as you can upload it to Blackboard) to address the prompts below: a letter, a dialogue, a short story, annotated illustrations, memes, and so forth. (Feel free to check in with me if you have trouble deciding.) You don't have to quote from our readings but it would be helpful if you could indicate (by endnotes or a note at the end of your response) what sources inspired your creative response. There is no specific word length for this assignment. Choose
one of the following scenarios: c.
Argument analysis (due by 5pm on Friday,
November 15) Format:
Your analysis should be 750-1000 and focus on the specific text
and question in the prompt. Choose only a few points and support
them when possible with direct citations (using chapter numbers
or page numbers). I.
In his Letter to Alexander of Constantinople, what
kinds of arguments does Alexander of Alexandria make against
Arius and his followers? How might a clever opponent respond to
those arguments? d.
Narrative analysis (due by 5pm on Friday
December 13) Format: Your analysis should be 750-1000 words focused on the specific text and prompt; you should focus on specific scenes to make your point and you do not need to summarize the whole narrative (assume you are writing for an audience that has already read it, like your classmates) I.
In her "Travel Journal," what kind of people does the pilgrim
Egeria encounter and how do they fit (or not fit) into her ideal
landscape of the holy land? Are these the same kinds of people a
modern pilgrim might want to meet?
4.
Final exercise (20%) You
have
four options for a synthetic final exercise: a.
Take-home final exam b.
Extended written response (rhetorical, creative, argument, or
narrative) Your
extended written response should be 1000-2000 words and cite
directly from the sources. c.
Scholarly book review Candida Moss, Ancient Christian Martyrdom Lynn Cohick, The Peri Pascha Attributed to Melito of Sardis Michael Williams, Rethinking "Gnosticism": An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category Julia Hillner, Helena Augusta: Mother of Empire Ari Finkelstein, The Specter of the Jews: Emperor Julian and the Rhetoric of Ethnicity in Syrian Antioch Georgia Frank, The Memory of the Eyes; Pilgrims to Living Saints in Christian Late Antiquity
A scholarly book review should: summarize the author's main
argument (s); describe the sources they use to make their
argument; assess the relationship between the argument and
sources (i.e., how persuasive is the argument in light of the
sources used); and suggest what audiences this work would be
appropriate for (undergraduates, advanced academics, etc.). The
goal is not to pass blanket judgment on the book (good or bad)
but to assess its argument. d.
Research bibliography
If you wish to pursue options b, c, or d please make an appointment to meet with me sometime early in the semester so we can get you on the right track. If you choose option a, the final exam will be made available one week before the due date. All final exercises are due to Blackboard by 5pm on the last day of final exams (December 20). There is no other final exam for this class.
|